Return to letters menu
Letter dated October 2001 reporting on the third
quarter of 2001
"It's the dumbest thing in the world to bet against the United States. It
hasn't worked since 1776." --Warren Buffett
The stock market has
rarely lost as much ground in an entire year as it lost in this past
quarter. For the year to date (as of Sep 30), the S&P has lost 21.2
percent, the Nasdaq has lost 39.3 percent, and the Dow has lost 18 percent.
Since World War II, only 1974’s loss of 26.5 percent on the S&P 500 was
worse. The worst damage of the year was done in the quarter just ended.
The S&P 500 lost 15.0 percent, the Nasdaq lost 30.6 percent, and the Dow
lost 15.8 percent. Since World War II, only three other quarters (in 1962,
‘74 and ’87) have seen such losses.
[ Your account
declined in value by 6.9 percent during the quarter. While that is not a
happy result in normal times, I hope you will agree that it was pretty good
at least in relative terms. ]
The market was weak
even before September 11, with the S&P having already dropped 6.4 percent in
August and another 3.6 percent in September before the tragedy. I raised a
fair amount of cash during that decline. As I have told you, I sell a
certain amount of stock during periods of protracted weakness for defensive
purposes. That approach comes with a risk of selling at just the wrong
time, and having to buy back into the market at higher prices. While there
are certain trades that I wish I could take back, this approach did in fact
help to protect your account during this severe decline. [ I made net sales
of nearly $xx in August and another $xx in the first ten days of
September. The portion of your account allocated to stocks was 48% in
mid-July, 43% by the end of August, and only 38% just before the terrorist
attack on September 11.
Moreover, we did succeed
in buying certain stocks back at substantially better prices. For example:
Obviously, these and
other trades generated more activity in your account than is normal for a
given period in time. But the frequency of trading was in reaction to
abnormally large price movements. While on balance this approach was
successful, certain trades did not work out as well. For instance, I sold
xx Ann Taylor at $23.35 and wound up buying xx back at $24.10. I bought
some Home Depot at $34.80, and decided to risk not more than 12 ˝% on half
of the position – and wound up getting stopped out of half of the position
at $30.40. While that was very disappointing, it is important to define
some ways to limit risk in a declining market and in this case our stop-loss
limit was simply in the wrong place.
The other
disappointment was that our losses were greater than they might have been
because we were somewhat overweighted in consumer cyclical and energy
stocks. In retrospect, the consumer sector has been one of few bright spots
in the economy, and I’m not sure anyone could foresee such a sharp and
sudden decline in stocks like Chicos. In recent days, it staged a good
comeback rally. As to oil stocks, I think it is a mistake to sell them on
weakness given the potential for instability in the Middle East. Again, oil
prices simply declined by more than I expected and stocks like Ocean Energy
fell by more than I anticipated.
The bottom line is
that I think we got out of certain stocks pretty well, used the sharp
decline to re-establish positions in certain good companies and to initiate
positions at good levels in blue chip stocks like GE, Citigroup and AOL
which came into attractive valuation levels after having been too expensive
for too long. And we have good positions in high-yielding stocks such as
Mack Cali and Thornburg Mortgage, which both have yields that are well over
8 percent. ]
It is hard enough
to make economic forecasts even without all of the geopolitical
uncertainty. But there are some encouraging signs. Real interest rates
have not been this low in many years. The drop in oil prices should provide
a boost to the economy. Fiscal policy is aggressively stimulative. And
most analysts think that the market is now somewhat undervalued.
Low interest rates
in particular should help spur an economic and market rebound. First, cash
earning two percent is not a particularly attractive investment. Anyone who
believes that stocks will generate any positive returns will have to
see equities as a better place to be than cash. Second, low rates generally
benefit the financial and housing sectors, and will ultimately make
financing purchases more attractive in both the capital goods and consumer
sectors.
Some observers say
that low rates didn’t help the Japanese economy. But we’re not Japan. We
may have had a technology bubble, but Japan has spent a decade recovering
from a much more comprehensive asset bubble. In the late 1980s, the
Japanese were buying office buildings at a 1% cap rate and Nippon
Telephone’s market cap exceeded that of the entire West German stock
market. Their banks are now in deep trouble, with capital adequacy ratios
far below international minimum standards. In contrast, our banking system
had the S&L shakeout a decade ago and is now strong. We have had rolling
recessions – with energy, banking, health care and other sectors peaking and
then correcting at different times. Technology might be the most extreme
case, but it is simply the most recent. And some thought that the 1983
sell-off in technology shares marked the end of the tech revolution. In
retrospect, it had barely begun. We may say the same thing in ten years
about this period.
Market history
provides further encouragement. First, each of the three terrible quarters
cited above turned out to be a great buying opportunity. Second, the market
has tended to sell off and then rebound after the onset of a political /
military crisis – whether the Cuban missile crisis, the Kennedy
assassination, or Pearl Harbor. The Pearl Harbor case was the sharpest
drop; the market plunged 7% in the few days after the attack. Here, the
initial reaction was a 14% drop – twice as much. Based in part on that
comparison, I judged that the initial reaction was probably too much. So I
put a good amount of cash to work while the S&P 500 Index was below 1000.
The market actually
did fairly well during both World War II and the Cold War. The Dow (easier
historical data to get) rallied from a low of 105.52 in December 1941 to
about 175 by August 1945. And the market was generally strong during the
Cold War years in the 1950s and 1960s, until the Dow hit a wall at the 1000
level. Arguably, the strain from both the Vietnam escalation and the Great
Society spending affected confidence, and helped to put a lid on stock
prices. Today, there is a strong argument that the nation’s defense needs
will spur the sectors most in need – capital goods (planes, other military
gear, infrastructure spending) and technology (storage, security, smarter
and faster devices). And as previously mentioned, stimulative monetary and
fiscal policy may keep the consumer sector strong.
While there are
many reasons to be optimistic about the country’s overall economic outlook
and the specific stocks that we own, there are still factors that must be
constantly re-assessed. Corporate earnings estimates are still being
revised downward, and it would be helpful to start seeing at least some
deceleration there. The market has not moved above its 200 day moving
average at all this year, which many analysts believe means that we are in a
long-term downtrend until there are clear technical signs indicating
otherwise. The political instability in countries such as Pakistan and
perhaps Saudi Arabia, the potential for conflagrations in the Mideast,
further terrorism here and other vagaries of war are all major risks. So
far, the market has held above the lows established during the Asian
financial crisis of 1998. A break below that level would be a significant
negative event.
I believe that your
portfolio well-balanced, with many stocks that are poised to lead the way in
an economic rebound and other securities that will do fairly well in almost
any economic environment. ** you should always feel free to call me
anytime you have questions or concerns. Let me close with a timely
statement from Warren Buffett:
"It's the dumbest thing in the world to bet against the
United States. It hasn't worked since 1776."
I hope all is well
with you and your loved ones.